<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Revisionist History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/</link>
	<description>Reports of Nitwit Lies, Antics, and Strange Goings On.  All snark, and no bite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:49:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t attribute that quote in my above comment to anyone in particular, as it came across the wire among a shit storm of other things related to Janrae and this blog.

Mike, I didn&#039;t mean to imply you said it, and I wasn&#039;t getting up in arms about it.  It&#039;s not worth any of our effort to do so.  I&#039;ve heard of you, but don&#039;t know you, and have no issue with you personally.

Someone wrote the above quote.  That fact remains.  The fact that it mentions this blog is indisputable.  If anyone believes that someone is trying to provoke a fight, I suggest they look elsewhere for the source.

The focus of this blog remains Pacione.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t attribute that quote in my above comment to anyone in particular, as it came across the wire among a shit storm of other things related to Janrae and this blog.</p>
<p>Mike, I didn&#8217;t mean to imply you said it, and I wasn&#8217;t getting up in arms about it.  It&#8217;s not worth any of our effort to do so.  I&#8217;ve heard of you, but don&#8217;t know you, and have no issue with you personally.</p>
<p>Someone wrote the above quote.  That fact remains.  The fact that it mentions this blog is indisputable.  If anyone believes that someone is trying to provoke a fight, I suggest they look elsewhere for the source.</p>
<p>The focus of this blog remains Pacione.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brendan</title>
		<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>And I never said you did.  And if you&#039;re going to try take what I say in proper context, you might want to post the whole entry.  Or, if you&#039;re going to twist my words around to fuel a pissing match, you might want to edit it more carefully, as you quote me (properly) saying, &quot;Which makes my inaccuracy all the worse.&quot;

That&#039;s sloppy at best, maliciously provoking a fight at worst.  Please contact me in the future before you quote me on anything.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I never said you did.  And if you&#8217;re going to try take what I say in proper context, you might want to post the whole entry.  Or, if you&#8217;re going to twist my words around to fuel a pissing match, you might want to edit it more carefully, as you quote me (properly) saying, &#8220;Which makes my inaccuracy all the worse.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s sloppy at best, maliciously provoking a fight at worst.  Please contact me in the future before you quote me on anything.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justafriend</title>
		<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>justafriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2175</guid>
		<description>Rusty, that is NOT what Mike said. Things are being taken out of context. He didn&#039;t say anything about you approving of or advocating pedophilia, he was referring to Janrae. He apologised to her and admitted his wrongdoing. Since it is something that is between him and her, I don&#039;t see why you would want to stir the pot.

C&#039;mon, play fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rusty, that is NOT what Mike said. Things are being taken out of context. He didn&#8217;t say anything about you approving of or advocating pedophilia, he was referring to Janrae. He apologised to her and admitted his wrongdoing. Since it is something that is between him and her, I don&#8217;t see why you would want to stir the pot.</p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, play fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2174</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2174</guid>
		<description>&quot;But what pisses me off is that Rusty translates &quot;seems to think there&#039;s nothing wrong with pedophilia&quot; to being an advocate for the same.  Which makes my inaccuracy all the worse.&quot;

Your fact-checking is again faulty.  I have never approved of, nor advocated pedophilia.  I&#039;m not Pacione-on-the-Thames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But what pisses me off is that Rusty translates &#8220;seems to think there&#8217;s nothing wrong with pedophilia&#8221; to being an advocate for the same.  Which makes my inaccuracy all the worse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Your fact-checking is again faulty.  I have never approved of, nor advocated pedophilia.  I&#8217;m not Pacione-on-the-Thames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cussedness</title>
		<link>http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>cussedness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therustynail.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/revisionist-history-2/#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>it was inaccessible because I made it friends only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was inaccessible because I made it friends only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
